![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
instep
comment event Style
watch Flash instep
overview Was
IIFA 2006 another sign of the Amitabh-Shahrukh rift? concert
review Musical
Notes
Vibes
Blockbuster season Everywhere but here MI 3 has pulled in the crowds, but can Hollywood blockbusters revive cinema culture in Pakistan? By Muniba Kamal It is so exciting when new films are released in Pakistan
weeks after their worldwide premieres. The excitement is doubled when the
film coming here is MI 3, the Tom Cruise starrer that kickstarted the summer
blockbuster season globally. The premiere last week saw a huge turnout, which
is rare for premieres. When passes are given for free, a lot of people don't
show up, unless they are really interested. MI 3 definitely qualifies as
interesting for the kind of people who are inivited to movie premieres A Tom Cruise franchise, of Cruise, by Cruise, for Cruise fanatics across the globe, MI 3, like it's predecessors pushes the action thriller envelope further than most movies take it. A thrill a minute joyride, it puts directorial reins in the hands of J.J. Abrams, the creator of the hit TV series Lost. With Tom Cruise as producer, Abrams must have had all the help and technical wizardry of Hollywood at his disposal and it shows. After all, MI 3 is his directorial debut on the big screen and it is such a pro effort. Non stop action from start to finish glosses over a paper
thin plot and allows the director to get away with murder. At the heart of it
is a deadly weapon called the rabbit's foot, which you don't know about to
till the end. But you don't care because the film is a visual roller coaster
keeping you on the edge of your seat, reaching mechanically for your popcorn.
The MI franchise is spectacular because it translates into great
entertainment. It may not be 'good cinema', but it is paisa vasool. It is not
designed to pull at your heartstrings, but to make you dole out the ticket
money and give in unashamedly to mind numbing/blowing entertainment. After coming out of the cinema and dissecting the film with friends, we decided that we didn't really get the plot but neither did we care. We were happy has clams, it was an hour and a half well spent such a different feeling from when one goes in to see a Pakistani movie. Foreign films have spoilt us rotten. The Hollywood and Bollywood juggernaut has hit us via cheap 100 rupee DVDs, pirate prints, demo prints, master prints. V for Vendetta, Rang De Basanti, Desperate Housewives and Ekta Kapoor's serials all make their way into our homes. The piracy distrbution network thrives as cinema as it is supposed to be seen dies. Our film industry has been fractured beyond repair and going by the reputation our filmmakers have in Thailand of defaulting on payments, it's not exactly doing wonders for Pakistan's image. The most creative work in the country is being done in the realm of ads and videos followed by television. However, cinema, the most artistic medium that has the potential to boost a country's profile beyond belief has been shunted off to the side with so much dilly-dallying by the government on policy that time is running out. Pakistan has a lot of catching up to do, but the problem is that we no longer have what it takes. Our cinemas have been converted into shopping malls, the good film directors relinquished television for film a long time ago and the remaining film investors are highly dubious characters. The system here is that there is no system. The competent directors who will do a different kind of cinema are facing a problem. Saqib Malik's Ajnabi Shehr Mein has been delayed. Jami's (Jamshed Mehmood) foray into film also came to naught. The only beacon of light seems to be Shoaib Mansoor's Khuda Key Liye, but how much time will lapse before that venture too sees the light of day. Rumoured to have army backing, Shoaib Mansoor's epic seems to be facing problems. It had enough problems getting off the ground. In a place without a system, filmmakers need godfathers who back them. When these people are not cinema friendly, there are differences and an eventual fall out. This is happening with every filmmaker who is trying to do something different. It's a vicious cycle that will continue till things fall into place. What one cannot understand is the policy on Indian cinema.
The day films (worth watching) are made here, India will be the biggest
market for them. They have the cinemas, cineplexes, multiplexes. All Pakistan
has got is a cinema circuit shrinking by the day and promises by Cinepax that
they will build cinemas all across the country, on which the work has yet to
start. Realistically, it is impossible that cinema can be revived by the
Hollywood juggernaut. Indian films will have to come in. The longer the
dilly-dallying continues, the more of an uphill task it will be when push
comes to shove. The efforts towards rapprochement so far have been pathetic. Taj Mahal was as much of a box office disaster here as it was in India. Ditto for Bride and Prejudice that is not pulling in the crowds; bad films never do. A grand premier happened last night for Mughal e Azam. The film was released prematurely in a cinema in Lahore, perhaps to make it the first Indian film to be released instead of Taj Mahal. It was a very short sighted move on part of Nadeem Mandviwalla. He could have taken solace in the fact that Mughal e Azam will be the first 'great' Indian film to be released in Pakistan. However, at the risk of sounding cynical, I doubt that it will do well. The reason is that we have all seen it, both the black and white version and the redone coloured version. Only so many people will go and see it on the big screen. It is Kabhi Alvida Na Kehna and Fanaa that would be box office gold. Come to think of it, the government's policy on Indian cinema that seems to hinge like everything else on Kashmir also seems very short sighted. Kashmir should have nothing to do with the revivification of the cinemas of our country. But since they do, they should take a closer look at Fanaa that makes a strong case for Kashmiri nationalism and is facing the wrath of Hindu extremists of the RSS. Had Fanaa been released here, a greater debate would have been instigated on Kashmir and the rights of its people on both sides of the border. It would have gone further in the war of words than both the Agra and Delhi summits combined. The beauty of cinema is that there are no ultimatums and therefore no stalemate. Indian cinema is perceived as a leveraging tool by the government. The irony is that it is also the crutch our cinemas need to get back on their feet. The reality is that cinema is neither a leverage nor a crutch, it a medium to entertain that can also provoke, raise awareness or make a political statement. The tragedy is that we have lost our cinema thanks to short sighted policies and the great Indian bogey man.
Rushk relaunched The Rushk album launch was as chilled out as Ziyyad Gulzar and as offbeat as Uns Mufti Huma Imtiaz In 2002, a video by the name of 'Behti Naar' grabbed the
audiences of the Pakistani local channel watching community by surprise and
alternatively, shock. Saqib Malik had begun to work his magic for music
videos, but more striking than the treatment was the storyline, and a
gorgeous girl cutting her hair off, accompanied by a song that took you to
dim-lit halls and beyond. Another video followed soon after with flashes of a
woman bound as a prisoner asking 'milega kiya tumhein ab/inn jalli katti
baton se?' Six months later, the videos for 'Behti Naar' and the anti-war 'Khwahish' were taken off air due to their controversial storylines and interest in the band began to generate in the music circles. The band came to surface soon after: Rushk, Uns Mufti and Ziyyad Gulzar's [of Milestones and Ali Azmat Band fame] brainchild was an amalgamation of haunting vocals, ringing telephones and music that pulled you right in. But the album Sawal that Rushk had released was nowhere to
be found. Bands like Noori had taken over the music arena and neither Uns nor
Ziyyad said a word. A few precious tapes had been released, which had long
since But this is 2006, and a record label in Pakistan has
finally re-released Rushk's debut effort. For the recently held launch show
the music and fashion industry turned out in full force, to support these two
talented men. To represent the fashion industry were the top names: Nomi
Ansari, Kami of Karma, Sarwat, Rubya Chaudhry, Sanam Agha, Vaneeza Ahmed and
photographer Amean J, who had previously directed the Rushk video 'Khwahish'.
The music industry attendees were as prominent: Ali Azmat, Sohail Javed, Alan
Smith and Haroon. It was fitting that the event While it is great to see a record label, and a TV and
radio station giving Footnote: Four years ago, Rushk's album did not have any takers. A week after it's release it is topping Vibes Charts in Instep. Goes to show how times have changed and tastes have grown.
Sister act comes to Karachi Nickie n Nina, the design label from Lahore has ventured
into the Karachi market by opening their own store on the high street Zamzama.
The shop
Jewellery juggernaut When clothes shift from one city to another, can jewellery
be far behind? AM Accessories, the label from Lahore recently came to Karachi
for an
Frieha thinking bigger than ever Not content with just doing shows, Frieha Altaf seems to
be diversifying as her twenty year mark in the fashion industry nears. With
the re-launch of her modelling agency Cats, Frieha has started paying more
attention to
FASHION UPDATE Go with the flow Summer is all about movement, especially when it comes to
clothes. The
Filming Islamic history Why is it so difficult for filmmakers to put Islamic history on celluloid? NFP looks back at The Message and the forces that continue to work against the portrayal of the coming of Islam on the world's most influential medium, that is, cinema By Nadeem F. Paracha Judgment Day Late last year they finally got him. Director of The
Message, Moustapha Though no Salman Rushdie, Moustapha had been a much-hated figure among many sections of world's Wahabi and Deobandi Muslims ever since he went ahead and shot a big-budgeted, Hollywood film on the life of Prophet Muhammad in 1976. Incidentally, though the film (The Message), was poorly received at the American box-office, over the years it became a massive cult classic among a number of more liberal minded Muslims, some of whom actually started to use it as part of their efforts to reform the commonly perceived face of Islam. In fact, impressed by epics like Jesus of Nazareth and The
Ten Commandments, Moustapha's main goal was also to make a film on the While trying to raise funds for the film, Moustapha faced stiff resistance from Hollywood in making a film about the origins of Islam. Even though the reasons behind this were fears of monitory loss, the fact that with various Palestinian guerrilla units being extremely active in the '70s (in collaboration with various Left-wing European groups), in attacking numerous Western and Israeli/Jew economic and political interests, it can not be dismissed that many in Hollywood also saw the making of this film as a way to counter the Western media's take on Muslims in this regard. Moustapha had to go outside the United States to raise the
production money for the film. However, many Muslim governments, fearful of
"offending" the large conservative sections of their own
predominantly With the backing of the then radical Libyan government, the film was shot in Libya and parts of Morocco. While creating the plot, Moustapha consulted Islamic clerics and scholars and devised the storyline from the views he got from these gentlemen. As a token, Moustapha would also produce a film based on the struggle of radical Libyan nationalist, Omer Mukhtar, four years later (and also starring Anthony Quinn). Though mindful of the fact that Islam did not allow the showing of the Muslim Prophet, the completed film failed to get a release in a majority of Muslim countries. Even in the United States some cinemas received threatening telephone calls from those who thought that the film offended Islam by portraying the Prophet in a physical way. The truth was Muhammad was never shown on screen. On March 9, 1977, a group of Black Muslims, led by Hamas Abdul Khaalis, seized several buildings and took 134 hostages in the District of Columbia. While their actions were related to a sectarian dispute within the Black Muslim community, one of their demands was to prevent the release of The Message. One of the terrorists specifically said "he wanted a guarantee from whole world it will never be shown" or they would execute some of the hostages.
Holier than thou Panned by western critics for pretending to be another Lawrence of Arabia, the film was kept at an arm's length by most Muslim countries, especially those that came under the "American camp" (during the Cold War). Apart from Shah's Iran where a fundamentalist but indigenous Islamic movement had already gained momentum against the country's pro-West monarchy, the so-called Islamic movements and forces in most other Muslim countries were largely being financed and backed by the United States and Saudi Arabia! A trend that would eventually evolve into the Mujahideen Movement in Afghanistan. In Pakistan's context, where The Message remained banned throughout Zia-ul-Haq's dictatorship in the '80s. A majority of the country's major politico-religious parties were all said to be on the payroll of the American CIA and Saudi Arabia. These parties' main role (led by the Jamaat-e-Islami) was to demonize the Left and later fuel "jihad" in Afghanistan against the Soviet Union. It is thus interesting to note that most of these parties were the first to condone and enforce Zia's ban on The Message, even though thanks to the time's rampant video rental boom (and racket!), shops having a video print of the film thrived. Nobody's quite sure as to why exactly these parties and the Pakistani government were so much against the showing of The Message, especially at a time when both the CIA and the Pakistani government were aggressively advertising and glorifying "jihad" and assorted Islamic propaganda to counter Soviet occupation of Afghanistan? However, many do believe that the underlying message of the film was of a version of Islam that contradicted the versions being peddled by the Zia regime. And anyways, his hostility towards radical Muslim leaders such as Col. Qaddafi was no secret. Zia had also directly been involved as a hired Pakistan army man who led the Jordanian government's armed onslaught against PLO camps in Jordan in 1970. Thus, a film that was seen by conservative Western political observers as an attempt by Libya to propagate the legitimacy of Qaddafi's and the PLO's struggle against the state of Israel and the United States, was a big no for those using increasingly conservative, militant and puritanical strains of Islam to recruit men for the so-called Mujahideen Movment in Afghanistan. Some 30 years later after it was first released, with no Soviet Union in Afghanistan (or no Soviet Union at all!) and no Cold War diktat, The Message finally arrived in Pakistan beyond the shady videotape deal. Last year it was shown repeatedly on one of Pakistan's biggest private TV channels . This time however, there were no cries of "blasphemy", at least not outwardly so. The film's original purpose remained intact: Not only to show the West "Islam's true history and face," but also to a whole generation of Muslims who for the last three decades had been indoctrinated with a rather violent and intolerant strain of Islam; the sort various Islamic governments had originally propagated, but were now trying to distance themselves from, post 9/11.
It's the spirit, dude! Apart from tackling the political and religious fall-ins and fall-outs of making a film like The Message, Moustapha also had to pull off a convincing portrayal of the Prophet without ever being allowed to show him. He had to make a film whose protagonist was, in effect, absent. He knew what was at stake. No one had ever successfully attempted a film about the Prophet. If he pulled it off, he'd be the cinematic voice of the Muslim world. If not, they might literally kill him. Faced with such daunting dilemmas, Moustapha decided to shoot around the main character. Muhammad never appears in The Message. He's presented in the first-person. Moustapha uses the camera to represent what the Prophet sees. He goes places, people talk to him, but you don't hear him. Moustapha hired four seasoned Muslim clerics to oversee the production of the film that began shooting in Morocco in early 1976 and where a huge replica of the Kabba was built. Soon the clerics got cold feet and quit! Then King Faisal of Saudi Arabia managed to convince Morocco's King Hassan that the false Mecca built for the movie might draw pilgrims away from the real holy city. This saw the Moroccan government kicking out Moustapha off his own set, and out of Morocco. Moustapha was then invited by Qaddafi to Libya where much of the film was completed.
No learning lessons The only other attempt to film the Muhammad came in 2002. This was the animated movie, Muhammad, The Last Prophet, directed by Richard Rich, a veteran Disney animator who had also directed The Fox and the Hound. The Last Prophet was released in the Middle East after being sanctioned by the same Islamic authorities who had originally banned the appearance of Mohammed on film, and who now demanded that Hamza, the character portrayed by Anthony Quinn in The Message, appear only from behind. The animated film borrows Moustapha's "Prophet-cam technique", and in one scene Mohammed is critically wounded in battle a rock hurtles into the camera! The Last Prophet never hit U.S. theaters, and has yet to be released on DVD.
Was IIFA 2006 another sign of the Amitabh-Shahrukh rift? The IIFA Awards weekend was held in Dubai and predictably
enough, Black swept the Awards. The ceremony was rather lackluster without
Shahrukh Khan, who many believe was absconding because of differences with
the Big B. The differences are being put down to Shahrukh's insecurity with Bollywood remains a highly politicized industry and even as Amitabh and Jaya Bachchan have often come under fire for their close relationship with Amar Singh of the Samajwadi Party, it is has also been widely reported that Shahrukh Khan is a personal friend of Priyanka Gandhi and her husband Robert Vadra. Add to that, the growing distance between the Bachchans and Sonia Gandhi that has become rather vicious of late and you you may have an inkling of the root of the estrangement. And then of course, there is the reality that each year,
SRK is becoming Shahrukh was also absconding at the all-important Filmfare Awards when it was understood that Amitabh would win for Black. He has repeated his absence with this year's IIFA, another awards ceremony he has always taken care not to miss. It can also not be ruled out that Shahrukh is perhaps
licking his wounds after the critically and commercially disastrous Paheli.
Will he bounce back to life and all the awards ceremonies if Kabhi Alvida Na But anyhow, we give you an account of the glittering yet lackluster IIFAs that still seemed very pale without Shahrukh and because they didn't play up the Aishwarya Abhishek card. After all, dignified silences never make for great entertainment...
review The difference between the 'man' and the 'boys' A recent gig in Karachi featuring Ali Azmat, Aaroh and Jal proved that munda shehr Lahore da Ali is still king when it comes to ruling the stage
By Maheen Sabeeh Concerts are inarguably one of the most common ways of how
Karachiites relax after a long weekend. Top that with Ali Azmat, Jal and
Aaroh being What was worth watching that night was the fact how three
similar acts, all belonging to the same genre, can be so different when
performing live. Notably, it was Ali Azmat who stole the show, followed
closely by Aaroh who managed to create a stir with their opening while Jal
proved to be a disappointment. Ali was the turning point that night and the
reasons are quite simple. Ali has toured all across the globe since his old
Junoon days that date back to the mid nineties. He has always managed to
command an audience of 5000 or more by consistently delivering bouncy,
melodic and It is an understood fact that classic numbers should
always be performed, but new material is also essential. Because not only
does it give fans a Concerts also are the simplest way to analyse how a band actually works together. What makes them tick? In both Aaroh and Ali Azmat's performance, it was visible that all the guys were having a ball. Farooq kept his mike moving from Haider to Khalid, both of whom nodded their heads along. And in Ali Azmat's performance, Alan Smith and Kamran Zaffar (bass) were laughing on stage as Ali was talking to them through his eyes. Ziyyad Gulzar was menacing with lead guitars. His opening of 'Main Challa' was a live evident factor. But the Jal guys seemed to be three separate people onstage. They were all on their own. The only one who looked as if he was having fun was Goher. Live energy is raw and cannot be mistaken for. If a band is having fun onstage, the energy moves around and makes a room in the audience. It is easy to capture a small gathering but not your masses. And that night, the crowd was just that: the masses. These people had come on a 400 rupees ticket to see their favourites weave the same kind of magic that is apparent all over MTV and Channel V when Daler Mehdi or A.R. Rahman or Sonu Nigam are performing. Ali Azmat rocked that night because out of the three acts his album is relatively new. It still has that hype built around it and everybody knows that this is the man who was once a Junooni. He makes up our rock music history as we know it. He also has a presence and he is an entertainer on and offstage. Plus, he is never boring. No matter how funny he looks, Ali always dances on the stage and swings his guitar and fortunately that night he did it quite well with 'Dil Ne Dil Se Kaha' and out of nowhere broke into 'Mumbai Se Aaya Mera Dost, Dost Ko Salaam Karo, Raat Ko Araam Karo.' That was again an unexpected twist to one of his songs. Ali is also very much grounded to his identity. The minute he opens his mouth, a Punjabi accent slips out unconsciously and that makes it easier for one to connect to him. With complete makeovers and identical shades, it is hard to make an identity out of Jal. Aaroh survives solely on the shoulders of Farooq Ahmed who has immense potential to take Aaroh to the masses. Whether he will conquer them or not, that solely depends on their upcoming album but he has what it takes to be the next rock entertainer. In the end, live performance is not just about having the right sound or playing the entire record out or performing for 60 minutes nonstop. An integral part of concert is to provide entertainment. Ghazals and qawwali nights are for sitting and listening quietly and back to back recitals. Clapping is considered to be an interruption. Proper codes have to be followed. Wearing jeans is considered bad manners. Similarly, a rock concert has its own unwritten rules to be followed. The biggest rule however is that any singer or artist who is able to shake the crowd and make them dance while keeping the sound right is a great live act. In our live act scene, we either have good sound artists or performers. There are very few who actually make a wholesome concert. Jal has some great songs to its credits but the time is now to work on their performing ability as a group before Atif Aslam steals the game from them for good. Aaroh, they have a long way to go but as long as Farooq Ahmed remains the leader of this band, hope is still there. As for Ali Azmat, he is still comfortably perched on the live rock throne and after this crackling show, one is sure he's not going anywhere anytime soon.
Shafqat is the best thing on Kabhi Alvida Na Kehna Kabhi Alvida Na Kehna's music by Shankar-Ehsaan-Loy has
just been released. The highlight of the album, without a doubt, is 'Mitwa',
sung by
Music television The biggest buzz is all the music channels that are coming
up now. With the growing music industry in Pakistan, it seems that all
television networks have zoned in on music as the next frontier. It makes
perfect sense. Music is the
Eminem to head West Eminem will return to the big screen in a version of the TV western Have Gun - Will Travel a modern-day adaptation of a 1950s western TV series about a gunfighter for hire. Paramount Pictures has extended an 18-month option on the property to develop it as a vehicle for the Detroit rapper who won critical acclaim with his performance in the film 8 Mile. Eminem has committed to shoot the role and is excited about his latest opportunity. The concept of the series will be updated to contemporary times and feature Eminem playing a bounty hunter. Now that should be fun, but not as much fun as it will be to see Missy Elliot playing herself.
Missy to herself in biopic Hip-hop star Missy Elliott is to play the lead role in a film chronicling her life, Universal Pictures has announced. The film, which is untitled and in the development phase,
will be produced by actor Robert De Niro through his company Tribeca Films.
Missy, who has won four Grammy awards during her career, is best known for
her hit 'Get Ur Freak On'. She has released six solo albums and produced for artists including Justin Timberlake and Janet Jackson. The musician, who was born in Portland, Virginia, began her performing career with all-female singing group Sista. She signed her first solo deal with Elektra Records on the condition that they would subsidise her own record label. Other recording artists she has worked with include Whitney Houston, Justin Timberlake and Madonna herself, but nothing beats her own albums. Get a hold of The Cookbook that came out last year and you'll see what we mean. If you're not a Missy Elliot fan, then you simply aren't hip! And there are no exceptions to this rule.
CHARTS "Music, in performance, is a type of sculpture. The air in the performance is sculpted into something." - Frank Zappa
Pakistani 1. Sawal - Rushk 2. Green - Rung 3. Overload - Overload 4. Be The One - Omer Inayat 5. Mantra - Faakhir
Vilayti 1. Let Love In - Goo Goo Dolls 2. Bring You Home - Ronan Keating 3. Stadium Arcadium - Red Hot Chilli Peppers 4. Oral Fixation Vol 2 - Shakira 5. Ten Thousand Days - Tool
Hindustani 1. Fanaa 2. Kabhi Alvida Na Kehna 3. Krrish 4. Gangster 5. Chupke Chupke
|
|